- Jul 12, 2018
- 9,342
One could not argue that living in Sweden, or any Scandinavian country for that matter, was an expensive affair. Modern history has proven, however, that despite the high taxes that the Nordic peoples must pay, the government usually spends that money effectively on services such as healthcare, public transportation, and police. For what has felt like ages, though, the Swedish people have been paying even more than normal. The people of Stockholm, which was the most expensive city in the country, were feeling this more than anyone else in the country. A small housing crisis had already begun as citizens failed to renew their expensive rents that they could no longer afford and no one was purchasing properties that would be virtually impossible to pay the monthly notes on. The people of Stockholm, who were stretched for cash, could no longer afford to splurge on finer foods or drinks or entertainment as they once could. Soon, local businesses began to feel the stress as well. After months and months and months of tolerating these high taxes, the Swedish people - and especially those in the capital of Stockholm - began to openly question why they were paying so much with little-to-no increase in public services. Rumors were started that the government was planning on going to war soon, or that this was due to corruption, or even that money was being spent on making foreign long-term investments. The validity of these claims could not be confirmed. However, everything changed on January 29th.
One of Stockholm's largest newspaper published a first page story, "Government Hoarding Money - Taxes Strangling Stockholm". Despite the downfall of print journalism, that paper sold more copies than any single issue had that entire year. Local radio and news picked up the story and interviewed the journalist who wrote it. In his story, he pointed out that the most recent government records showed that Sweden had a surplus of $34.9-billion dollars. Swedes, like their other Nordic brothers, have an above-average amount of faith in their government, which is why the revelation that the government was hoarding so much money brought such surprise and then outrage. The story continued to spread, and concerned (and angry) Swedes decided to publicly express themselves. In less than a day, there was near-unanimous consensus among the Swedish people that what the government was doing was not only wrong, but also made no sense. With no public plans to use most of this money, and there being no national emergency, the common Swede simply saw this entire fiasco as the government hoarding an incredibly fortune for a rainy day, at the cost of the happiness and wealth of the people. The story went on to note that in the past months, it appears the number of suicides, petty-crime, and violent crime have all gone up. While the Swedish people retained their patriotism and support for the government, it was quite clear that the vast majority of the country was outraged with the current state of events.
On the last day of January, mass protests were organized around Sweden, but especially in the city of Stockholm where over 100,000 people took to the streets to, mostly, peacefully protest. Thousands of people from all ages, male and female, could be seen holding signs protesting the government and the high taxes. These protests culminated in downtown Stockholm, where Swedish legislators could hear the roaring chants of protestors. While the protests have so far been peaceful, the occasional report of fights or violence were starting to show that a mass movement such as this with no central authority wouldn't remain stable for much longer. Everyone from fast-food workers to corporate CEOs were looking to, and pressuring, the government to be more realistic in their economic policies.
@Connor
One of Stockholm's largest newspaper published a first page story, "Government Hoarding Money - Taxes Strangling Stockholm". Despite the downfall of print journalism, that paper sold more copies than any single issue had that entire year. Local radio and news picked up the story and interviewed the journalist who wrote it. In his story, he pointed out that the most recent government records showed that Sweden had a surplus of $34.9-billion dollars. Swedes, like their other Nordic brothers, have an above-average amount of faith in their government, which is why the revelation that the government was hoarding so much money brought such surprise and then outrage. The story continued to spread, and concerned (and angry) Swedes decided to publicly express themselves. In less than a day, there was near-unanimous consensus among the Swedish people that what the government was doing was not only wrong, but also made no sense. With no public plans to use most of this money, and there being no national emergency, the common Swede simply saw this entire fiasco as the government hoarding an incredibly fortune for a rainy day, at the cost of the happiness and wealth of the people. The story went on to note that in the past months, it appears the number of suicides, petty-crime, and violent crime have all gone up. While the Swedish people retained their patriotism and support for the government, it was quite clear that the vast majority of the country was outraged with the current state of events.
On the last day of January, mass protests were organized around Sweden, but especially in the city of Stockholm where over 100,000 people took to the streets to, mostly, peacefully protest. Thousands of people from all ages, male and female, could be seen holding signs protesting the government and the high taxes. These protests culminated in downtown Stockholm, where Swedish legislators could hear the roaring chants of protestors. While the protests have so far been peaceful, the occasional report of fights or violence were starting to show that a mass movement such as this with no central authority wouldn't remain stable for much longer. Everyone from fast-food workers to corporate CEOs were looking to, and pressuring, the government to be more realistic in their economic policies.
@Connor