National Security Council

[Odinson]

UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL​

The United States National Security Council (NSC) exists to advise the President on military matters, national security affairs, and foreign affairs. The NSC is chaired by the President and consists of numerous members such as the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, and others. The NSC has regular meetings at the White House and can also be summoned by the President to the White House during emergencies.

CHAIRMAN

Benjamin V. Sinclair
President


MEMBERS

Richard Blumenthal
Vice President

Luke Adams
Secretary of State

Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense

Tom Lambert
Secretary of Energy

Elliot Gray
Secretary of the Treasury

Sean Langley
Attorney General

Arlo Poole
Secretary of Homeland Security

Harvey Baker
White House Chief of Staff

Alice Fink
National Security Advisor

General Roy Clements
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Lucy Marsh
Director of Central Intelligence​

​

 

[Odinson]

NSC MEETING​

Secret​

The United States's new Strategic Accountability policy, which aimed to hold the sellers/producers of strategic weapons and WMDs responsible as well as those who use them against the United States or her allies, had drawn criticism from a few countries, most notably the Russian Federation. The purpose of the temporary policy was to be a stopgap measure until an international summit on strategic weapons and WMDs could be held later in 2005. President Sinclair is especially worried about the effect of this policy's relationship between the United States and Russia. This meeting was held in the Oval Office.

---

MEETING MINUTES
THE WHITE HOUSE
June 28, 2005​

MEMBERS PRESENT
President Benjamin V. Sinclair
Vice President Richard Blumenthal
White House Chief of Staff Harvey Baker
Attorney General Sean Langley
Secretary of Energy Tom Lambert
Secretary of State Luke Adams
National Security Advisor Morgan Fink
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates
Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff General Roy Clements (USAF)
Secretary of Homeland Security Arlo Poole
Director of Central Intelligence Lucy Marsh


BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Thank you all for coming to this meeting, I know that it was last minute. First, I want to congratulate Lucy Marsh on being confirmed by the Senate as the Director of Central Intelligence. I know that the Senate gave you a harder time than most of my appointees, so thank you for sticking through it.

LUCY MARSH [CIA]: Thank you, Mister President. It is my pleasure to serve.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: You all should have gotten the memo of why we are meeting today. Strategic Accountability has upset the Russians. On page two of your packet is President Nemstov's message to me from this morning... Your copies of our correspondence doesn't leave this room. I am not looking to pass blame on anyone for this. I am ultimately responsible since I approved this the last time we met, but I think we all really dropped the ball since the Russians were barely mentioned.

ROY CLEMENTS [JOINT CHIEFS]: Mister President, the Russians would have had something negative to say regardless of what we did. Any action by us reminds them that their entire country is a dying relic of the Cold War.

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: I have to agree with the general, Mister President. There is no scenario where the Russians would have been happy that we are trying to limit their ability to export arms. Sometimes it seems like the Russian state is just an international arms dealer with sovereignty.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Robert, that might be true for the previous two governments, but the democratic system under Nemstov seems to be a lot more... stable and realistic. President Nemstov even told me directly about that situation with Portugal, and he did that because I had told him I wanted to hold these international talks in Washington. Do you all really think that he wants to shoot down a world where the United States and Russia can be partners?

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: Yes.

ROY CLEMENTS [JOINT CHIEFS]: Yes, sir.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: No, Mister President. I think that President Nemstov is under immense pressure by his own government and high-ranking officials in his military to appear strong and tough. I think that this policy we made isn't necessarily the issue, but it's that we did it without consulting the Russians.

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: Consulting the Russians? What else should we consult the Russians about, Mister Secretary? Should they have a say in how many warships we're allowed to build, or what laws congress can pass? We can't just run everything through the Russians.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Secretary Gates, we both know you're using a strawman argument there. I'm not saying we should run everything by the Russians. But think about it from their perspective, this probably seems like a pretty big slap in the face to them.

LUCY MARSH [CIA]: Mister President, I agree with Secretary Adams. The Russians, or at least President Nemstov, are expecting you to treat them like an international partner, since that is how you worded things when you were running for President. When you're working on a project with a partner, you make major decisions like this with the informed consent of the other partner. Keep in mind that this potential summit predates your presidency. President Gore reached out to President Nemstov, and he seemed receptive then too. We only have so much grace from the Russians before they start to think that we're leading them along.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: Director Marsh, are you suggesting that we publicly abandon Strategic Accountability right after we have put it in place? I mean, sure the Russians would be getting what they want, but their entire culture is all about strength. Wouldn't that concession do more harm than good?

LUCY MARSH [CIA]: Abandoning the policy is not a sound option, Mister Vice President. It would indeed make us look weak to the Russians and the rest of the world.

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: Mister President, I think we're forgetting part of the bigger picture here. I don't think that the Russians are upset with this policy because we didn't include them in making it, I think they're upset because they want to continue to be one of the biggest arms dealers in the world, and they want to export strategic weapons as well. This is all about money and somewhat about Russian pride too. Mister President, you should send a response to President Nemstov and tell him that you regret that our policy has frustrated them, but that it's only temporary and for the better of the entire world until we get some kind of international agreement in place. If he's a man of his word, they'll still send someone to the conference.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: He probably is a man of his word, whatever the Russian version of that is. The problem is that kind of response would make us, or more specifically the President, look like he isn't a man of his word. If we do that we'd be setting back relations with the Russians at best, and making them resent us while making President Nemstov look stupid at worst.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: So, we can't abandon the policy and we also cannot uphold the policy and tell the Russians to punch sand. I want an outcome where President Nemstov can see that I made a genuine mistake, that we are taking a step to make up for it, that we want to work with them, but that we are also still standing strong on our policy... Alice, you've been quiet. What are your thoughts?

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: ...Mister President, I think that the two greatest gestures you could make for the Russians would be to be honest why we put this policy in place in the first place, and the modify the policy.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: I don't think anyone has suggested that we lie, Alice. What do you mean?

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: A lie by omission is still a lie. We're not being honest with them about why we had to shoot from the hip with this policy instead of waiting for the summit to put policy in place: that imperial proclamation from France made us concerned that they'll start selling ICBMs and Anthrax or something worse to Thailand and any other rogue state just so that they can start crawling their way out of the immense debt that they're in. Tell President Nemstov that, tell him that we had no choice but to act hastily, tell him "sorry" in some kind of diplomatic way, and also tell him that the State Department will modify the policy so that it does not, in any way, apply to the Russian Federation. That way the Russians don't have the policy apply to them and Nemstov has a valid explanation for his advisors and generals, we can limit the reputational damage to the White House and the State Department, and we can keep the policy.

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: And then what, we'll make exceptions for Sweden, China, and the French?

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: Amending the policy for one country does seem kind of.... open ended.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: I like Alice's approach. What we can do is make the amendment and release a statement that this is a one-time change and that this is the only exception... In fact, maybe we can call it a "clarification." The optics would probably be a bit better.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: I don't think that would be a direct enough way to do it... I think it needs to come from me, somehow. I'm not exactly sure how we would do it.

SEAN LANGLEY [JUSTICE]: Mister President, you could issue an executive order that states that the policy does not apply to the Russian Federation. Executive orders, as you know, hold the force of law and are a legal order from you to the rest of the government. The State Department wouldn't need to amend the policy, because you just amended it yourself with the powers of the presidency... You could sign the executive order here in the Oval Office, and then walk the fifteen feet to the press briefing room, stand at the podium, and briefly explain the executive order and then take questions. That would be the most simple, streamlined, and direct way to do this.

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: I agree with the Attorney General, that would be a great way to do it....

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Maybe you could even get Nemstov to watch the press briefing live. Send him a message early that morning and explain everything to him, and tell him that you will sign an executive order at 1:00 P.M. in Washington to exempt Russia from the policy. That would be 9:00 P.M. in Moscow. Sign the executive order at 1:00, and then talk to the press and answer their questions. If that is not the best way to correct this, then I don't know what is. We maintain the policy, but we exempt the Russians. You can explain to the press, if they ask, why the Russians are being exempted. Say that it was a miscalculation and that we want the United States and Russia, as the two most powerful countries in the world, to set an example and work together... Something like that.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: So, send the message to President Nemstov in the morning, sign the executive order at 1:00, and then I give the press briefing immediately after and answer all of the hardest questions that the vultures can throw at me. Are we missing anything?

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Thank you, everyone.​

 

[Odinson]

NSC MEETING​

Secret​

A Category 5 hurricane, named "Katrina," was heading towards the Gulf Coast and the City of New Orleans. The Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was on vacation in Alaska, so the Director of The National Weather Service joined the National Security Council via a secure telephone call to the White House. The Governor of Louisiana was also joined via a secure telephone call. While Louisiana was no stranger to being hit by major hurricanes, a storm of this magnitude directly hitting Louisiana's largest cities would be something that had never happened in modern times. The Louisiana State Government, as well as parish and local governments, were woefully unprepared for the storm if it impacted Louisiana as it was being projected at that time.

---

MEETING MINUTES
THE WHITE HOUSE
August 26, 2005​

MEMBERS PRESENT
President Benjamin V. Sinclair
Vice President Richard Blumenthal
White House Chief of Staff Harvey Baker
Attorney General Sean Langley
Secretary of Energy Tom Lambert
Secretary of State Luke Adams
National Security Advisor Alice Fink
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates
Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff General Roy Clements (USAF)
Secretary of Homeland Security Arlo Poole
Director of Central Intelligence Lucy Marsh

GUESTS PRESENT - Secure Telephone
Governor of Louisiana Vincent Avery
Director of The National Weather Service David Johnson


BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Thank you, everyone, for coming on short notice. Harvey, do we have Avery?

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Yes sir. They're connecting him now......

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: Governor Avery, this is Alice Fink, National Security Advisor to the President. You are on speakerphone in the Oval Office with the President, myself, the National Security Council, and the Director of The National Weather Service, David Johnson. Can you hear us, Governor?

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: I can hear you, Ms. Alice. Mister President, thank you for taking my call. Mayor Landry wanted me to tell you that he wished he could make the call.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Governor Avery, taking your call is the least that I can do. How are you doing in Baton Rouge? What is the situation like over there?

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: It's been raining here for the past four or five days, and the hurricane is still out in the Gulf of Mexico. From the sounds of it, if Katrina comes towards us, it is going to drop a lot of rain and we are already soaked.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: David, what are the chances that this storm is going to impact New Orleans and Baton Rouge?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: Mister President, Governor Avery, I am absolutely certain that Hurricane Katrina will hit New Orleans. The absolute best-case scenario for New Orleans is that the storm moves at least 50 miles to the East... But, I don't think that is going to happen.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: Director Johnson, what if the storm doesn't move to the East?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: If the storm does not move East, then New Orleans will be directly East of the eye of a Category 5 hurricane. It is very likely that the storm will weaken before the worst part of the storm hits New Orleans - this happens with all hurricanes when they make landfall - but even if Katrina weakened to, say, a Category 3, you could still see sustained winds of 130 miles per hour in New Orleans and the surrounding area.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: What about the rain?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: With the eye being that close to the city, New Orleans would get the full brunt force of the hurricane. First, the weather would degrade over the course of a day until the worst of the storm is battering the city, then the winds will reverse as the storm moves away. Hopefully, after the storm, there would not be many stray rain bands that bring more rain to the area. New Orleans could get up to a foot of rain in a period of twenty-four hours.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: David, what would be a worst-case scenario?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: Given the data and information that we have now, a worst-case scenario would be Katrina battering New Orleans as a Category 5, and being a full-strength Category 3, or a weak Category 4 at landfall. In that case, the worst of the storm would bring 130-140 miler per hour winds, eight to twelve inches of rain, power outages for New Orleans and Baton Rouge, and massive blackouts for all of southern Louisiana. Tornados would spawn randomly over the path of the hurricane. These tornados themselves likely would not be massive supercells like we see in the Great Plains, but some of them could possibly reach 150 miles per hour. Because of the chaos from the storm, they would be difficult to predict.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: What about the storm surge?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: What's a "storm surge?"

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: Hurricanes form what is called a "storm surge." The sustained winds of the storm push large quantities of water towards land, which makes a kind of "tide." While a normal tide will fluctuate from 6 inches to a foot and a half, a storm surge could cause several feet more of water. This kind of storm... well, I can't estimate it accurately right now, but it could be anywhere from 10 to 30 feet of water... And on top of that, regardless of where Katrina hits, she will make landfall during high tide. I think that the storm surge will be towards the higher side of that estimate.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: Governor, this is Vice President Blumenthal. My understanding is that New Orleans is surrounded by levees to protect the city from a storm surge? Is that true?

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: Well... yes sir, that is partially true. Large parts of New Orleans are actually below sea level due to subsidence. The levees keep the water out during normal conditions, but they also protect the city from a storm surge. However... If what Director Johnson is saying is true, a storm surge of 30 feet would be 16 feet taller than our levees that protect Eastern New Orleans... Even if a more conservative storm surge happens, the levees will be overwhelmed.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: Does the city have pumps to pump out rain water, or flood waters, in a situation like this?

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: Yes... A third of them are currently off-line due to maintenance issues, and we aren't sure if the remaining ones will work, especially if the power is out for more than twenty-four hours.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Alice, what is the worst-case scenario for Katrina?

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: The scenario laid out by Director Johnson lines up with what we have been able to ascertain... The eastern eyewall of Katrina hits New Orleans. Storm surges of up to thirty feet affect the coast, and also directly affect New Orleans from the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Pontchartrain. New Orleans loses power before the worst of the storm hits the city. Water not only flows over the levees, but the levees fail in numerous places around the city. The pumps in the city are largely ineffective. The storm surge, and a torrential downpour, flood over three-fourths of the city and surrounding municipalities. There will be billions-of-dollars worth of damage, there will be tens-of-thousands of refugees from New Orleans alone, and one of the most important ports in the United States will be closed for months, if not mostly destroyed. If evacuations are not taken seriously, or if they are not called for soon enough, thousands could die during the storm, and thousands more could die afterwards. Providing disaster relief will be difficult and time consuming since the flood waters will not retreat from most of the city, since most of the city is under sea level. Looting is guaranteed, fires will burn uncontrolled, and critical infrastructure throughout the city will be destroyed or damaged. Not to mention, refineries from New Orleans to Baton Rouge along the Mississippi River will be taken offline and the price of gasoline is likely to go up anywhere from twenty-five cents to a dollar... If Director Johnson's predictions are true, this will be a perfect storm, and we are likely to face this worst-case scenario head on, Mister President.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: Oh my God.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: David, are you absolutely sure that New Orleans is going to get the worst of this storm? That the East side of the eyewall will hit the city?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: I am certain, Mister President.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: How certain?

DAVID JOHNSON [DIRECTOR-N.W.S]: I am 95% certain. If that is not how the storm makes landfall, then the eye of the storm will go directly over the city. While that would be slightly better, it would still be devastating.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Governor, you need to call the Mayor of New Orleans and order a mandatory evacuation of the city - of all of Orleans Parish. In return, I will declare a federal disaster for the State of Louisiana, as well as a couple of others. That way, we can start bringing supplies and manpower into Louisiana. I cannot - the Federal Government cannot help unless the State of Louisiana asks for it.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: I am going to mobilize the entire Louisiana National Guard today, and I am going to call the Mayor. Under Louisiana state law, I cannot order a mandatory evacuation. Only the Parish President, or in this case the Mayor of New Orleans, can legally do so. I will urge him to evacuate the city.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: If he is reluctant to do so, let me know immediately and I will call him myself. Time is of the essence, Governor.

VINCENT AVERY [GOV-LA]: Thank you, Mister President, I will.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: It's obvious that the National Guard from Louisiana and other states will play a part in this. Will we have any response from the Gulf itself?

ARLO POOLE [HOMELAND SECURITY]: The Coast Guard will deploy cutters to the Louisiana Coast to assist with stranded individuals. They are going to work in tandem with the Navy and the Marines, if you choose to deploy them, Mister President.

ROBERT GATES [DEFENSE]: I advise that we deploy an Amphibious Assault ship so that we can send our Ospreys in with supplies and Marines, if need be, Mister President.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: You have all given me a lot to think about, thank you. Mister Vice President, stay behind with me after the meeting. Governor, I'll wait to hear back from you within the hour. Anything else, Alice?

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: No, Mister President.

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Thank you, everyone.​

 

[Odinson]

NSC MEETING​

Secret​

The Russian and Indian governments are $120-billion and $103-billion in debt, respectively. President Sinclair has returned to the White House from a short vacation to Maine after news came through of a negative market reaction to even more Russian and Indian debt. Global markets are unstable and, despite a strong domestic market, the National Economic Council is concerned that there could economic turmoil in the United States because of irresponsible spending internationally.

---

MEETING MINUTES
THE WHITE HOUSE
April 7, 2006​

MEMBERS PRESENT
President Benjamin V. Sinclair
Vice President Richard Blumenthal
White House Chief of Staff Harvey Baker
Attorney General Sean Langley
Secretary of Energy Tom Lambert
Secretary of State Luke Adams
National Security Advisor Alice Fink
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates
Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff General Roy Clements (USAF)
Secretary of Homeland Security Arlo Poole
Director of Central Intelligence Lucy Marsh

GUESTS PRESENT - In Person
Assistant to the President for Economic Policy Mason Watercott


HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Good morning, everyone. Mason, thanks for coming back to Washington on such short notice.

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: It's my job, happy to be here. Mister President, how was Maine?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: It was outstanding, Mister Watercott. I wish I was still there, but I heard that the world is about to end?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Not exactly, sir.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: The Indians and the Russians are obviously in a world of pain right now. How many rubles does it cost to buy a loaf of bread?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Somewhere between 330 and 360, depending on where you are in Russia.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: You actually know that off of the top of your head?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Yes sir.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: So what would that be the equivalent to, in dollars?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Imagine that three months ago you could buy a loaf of bread for $2.10 and now, today, it costs about $4.20.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: So the Russians have, essentially, acquired so much debt that it is debasing their currency?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: The Russians and the Indians - but it's roughly a quarter worse in Russia.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Economically, how is this going to blow back on us, and the rest of the world?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: We are already seeing it in the markets, Mister President. Since you landed in Washington this morning, the Dow Jones has gone down four percent. Since I got to the White House forty-five minutes ago, the Dow has dropped half a percent. We're in the beginning of the reaction right now, I think by lunch we're going to see the first circuit-breaker hit when the Dow drops seven percent.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: You think that we are going to see a seven percent drop in the market today?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Not exactly, Mister Vice President. Like I said, I think that's where we'll be by lunch. We could hit the second circuit breaker, thirteen percent, before the end of trading today. Also, it's the National Economic Council thinks that, not just me. We are already due for a correction in the market and this is also going to put significant fears on global trade and stability. India is one of the most populous countries on Earth and Russia... well this isn't the first time that we've seen Russia do something like this in the past ten years, but it just wasn't on this level before.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Is there anything that we can do to help the Indians and the Russians?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Their combined debt is a little over double the combined treasuries of the United States, Great Britain, and Sweden. However, that's not the end of the problem. France and Thailand also add on another $61-billion in debt. Global debt has not been this high since... Well, it was well-before the Gore Administration. In short, no. We cannot bail out India or Russia and I think it would be political suicide to bail out the French and Thailand. On the bright side, we are in the green.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: But, the market is still crashing?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: The market is almost as much a reflection of investor emotion as it is an accurate measure of market value. We- you, sir, need to assure the American People and the rest of the world that we're in good financial shape and that the market correction we're about to experience isn't going to smack the United States like it is the Indians.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: I can get in front of the cameras this evening and tell the world to calm down, but the damage may already be done if the market has dropped by 13 percent by the end of trading. Typically, I address the nation during prime time to reach the widest audience.

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: Well... The National Economic Council, and I, recommend that you suspend trading on the stock market for the rest of the day and give the market a chance to cool down. In that same announcement, make sure that the White Houe states that you will address the nation this evening. In your speech, we recommend that you speak to the robust nature of the American economy, the investments that have been made into infrastructure, New Orleans, Detroit... Then, remind the public that the United States is not indebted to any foreign country and that, effective tomorrow, the United States will repay $5-billion of debt to the Federal Reserve.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: So we're just suppose to sit back and watch the Russians and Indians implode, with France and Thailand to follow?

MASON WATERCOTT [ECONOMIC POLICY]: There is nothing that we can do for them on our own. We might be able to get with the British, Swedes, Dutch, and Ethiopia to ease some of the pain, but then we'll have to guarantee that they won't just buy more military equipment that they can't afford.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: It's kind of hard to have a good navy when all of your sailors have deserted.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Mister Watercott, I'll call the Treasury and the SEC. We're going with your advice unless anyone has objections?....

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Thank you, everyone.​

 

[Odinson]

NSC MEETING​

Secret​

President Sinclair was briefed on a military operation that took place in Antarctica over 50 years ago. The meeting - which was itself secret - resulted in the President altering his opinion on what American foreign policy should be concerning Antarctica. President Sinclair called a meeting of the NSC to decide how the United States should gain a foothold on the continent without totally destabilizing the global order, or revealing the secret he wished that he never had to learn.

---

MEETING MINUTES
THE WHITE HOUSE
January 5, 2008​

MEMBERS PRESENT
President Benjamin V. Sinclair
Vice President Richard Blumenthal
White House Chief of Staff Harvey Baker
Attorney General Sean Langley
Secretary of Energy Tom Lambert
Secretary of State Luke Adams
National Security Advisor Alice Fink
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates
Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff General Roy Clements (USAF)
Secretary of Homeland Security Arlo Poole
Director of Central Intelligence Lucy Marsh

GUESTS PRESENT - In Person
Commandant of The Coast Guard Admiral Mason Walker
Commander of The Office of Naval Intelligence Rear Admiral Brent Goodman



HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Good morning, everyone. Thank you for making it on such short notice. Mister President, you told me that you wanted to make an opening statement?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Yes, thank you Harvey, and thanks everyone for being here on such short notice... The United States will claim a foothold in Antarctica, there is no negotiation beyond that point. Part of Antarctica is the sovereign territory of the United States of America - I want to know how we make that reality.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Mister President... We haven't discussed this... This is a drastic change, sir. I mean... this is a serious change to the previous administration, and it's coming out of nowhere, sir.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Mister Secretary, the United States deserves a foothold in Antarctica. I'm not sure why one country on the other side of the planet should have sovereignty over an entire continent that should belong to the entire world... Can we take the entire continent?

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Sir, I'm sure we could take the entire continent and a lot more, but if we do, we would just become a version of what you described... a country on the other side of the planet that has sovereignty over an entire continent. What has you concerned over Swedish ownership of the continent all of a sudden?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Sweden doesn't own the entire continent, that is now the official policy of this administration.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Yes, sir... So are you suggesting that we go to war with Sweden?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Preferably not, I don't think either side would want that. What I want is a way that we can get a solid foothold in Antarctica, preferably without having to fight a war or totally end our alliance with Sweden. Also, we'd need to find a way to sell this to the American People...

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: ...Come on, anyone? I have some of the smartest people in the world in this room with me. Throw out some ideas.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: When we do it, however we do it, we could say that it's for national security reasons. I mean, we've been preparing for missile attacks from the Arctic, the Pacific, and the Atlantic since the 50s. But we are more vulnerable from the southern hemisphere.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Good start, Mister Vice President. Not a bad idea. Who else?

ROBERT M. GATES [DEFENSE]: Mister President, if you want to take Antarctica, I can deliver that entire continent for you. There are intelligence officials in the room who can comment on this better, but my suspicion is that taking the entire continent would lead to an inevitable war with Sweden. We'd probably have to sink their carrier and land troops in South Africa before they would want to negotiate any kind of peace. I would not advise taking the entire continent, but I feel confident that we could do it. General?

ROY CLEMENTS [JOINT CHIEFS]: Mister Secretary, Mister President, we could secure the entire continent within three weeks if you are going to give me full access to our armed forces to do so. There isn't much to secure outside of a handful of outposts, but the Navy would need to patrol some of the coldest, most remote, and dangerous waters on the planet.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Sweden has claimed a lot of overseas Antarctic territories from other countries. If they play hardball and don't want to negotiate, we could threaten to make this a wider global effort where we want all overseas territories claimed by Sweden to be returned. However, something that needs to be considered is that we need to have an explanation of why this is a priority of your administration, all of a sudden.

LUCY MARSH [CIA]: We all know that the Swedes are... sneaky. The take treaties and agreements and they bend them. They take international law, and they bend it, or break it... I bet that it would not be too hard to find a way which they are breaking the Antarctic Treaty, or at least find a way that they are seriously violating the spirit of it. If we could find that, then that would be a great opener.

BRENT GOODMAN [NAVY INTEL]: Well, they aren't suppose to be militarizing Antarctica.. But the Swedes militarize everything that they can. I bet if we conduct some reconnaissance missions, we will find some base or fortification that they have made there. Even if it isn't necessarily on the continent, my gamble is that they have at least militarized something that they shouldn't have.

ROBERT M. GATES [DEFENSE]: What kind of reconnaissance missions?

BRENT GOODMAN [NAVY INTEL]: From a Navy perspective, the USS Jimmy Carter would be a powerful asset to have down there to listen for communications. I'm less educated in what the Air Force is capable of, but I'm sure we could find a way to get some reconnaissance aircraft down there. It also wouldn't hurt to just send some destroyers or, if we want to play more innocent, Coast Guard cutters.

MASON WALKER [COAST GUARD]: The Coast Guard has vessels that can operate in these waters. We have icebreakers and Celestial-class cutters that have the range. But if they are going to be put in very overt situations, we would want the Navy nearby.

BRENT GOODMAN [NAVY INTEL]: Admiral, the point here would be to be covert. The Coast Guard isn't a global force like the Navy, but it has deployed globally. There would be nothing unusual with cutters operating in the Southern Ocean. They would be listening for radio chatter and searching for Swedish activity down there, that is it.

ROY CLEMENTS [JOINT CHIEFS]: We could get some reconnaissance aircraft down there, but it would be a pretty big task to have them fly over the continent. We would be beholden to the Australians and the British - it would really come down to if they would let us refuel in their territory, otherwise we would have very limited and logistically difficult options. It would still be possible, but more limited.

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Did our ambassador to the Global Assembly vote for the Antarctic Treaty?

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: I don't have that information right now, but I can get it.

RICHARD BLUMENTHAL [VPOTUS]: We never ratified it in the Senate, I was on Foreign Relations.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: You're kidding.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: He's right, I was never asked to bring that up for a vote when I was Vice President... Damn, what an oversight.

SEAN LANGLEY [JUSTICE]: An oversight, and an opportunity...

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Elaborate, Sean.

SEAN LANGLEY [JUSTICE]: If the Senate hasn't ratified it, then legally - at least from a domestic sense - it doesn't apply to us. Sure the Global Assembly will want to hold us to it, but you will not be violating a ratified treaty.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: What part would we be concerned with violating?

SEAN LANGLEY [JUSTICE]: The recognition of Sweden's sovereignty over Antarctica, and conducting military operations below... I think it's 60 degrees South.

LUKE ADAMS [STATE]: Just because we can do something, doesn't necessary mean that we should. If we could avoid having warships and soldiers around Antarctica and in Antarctic waters, then that would be for the best.

LUCY MARSH [CIA]: Well, if it would be better optically, could all operations below the treaty line be done by the Coast Guard?

MASON WALKER [COAST GUARD]: What kind of operations, exactly?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: The United States needs a foothold in Antarctica.

ARLO POOLE [HOMELAND SECURITY]: Mister President, are you asking if we should use the Coast Guard to invade Antarctica?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Arlo, what I'm saying is that we need a foothold in Antarctica. The Coast Guard isn't under DoD, but it has more assets than any federal agency that I can think of.

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: Um... Mister President, if you don't mind, I'd like to recap on what we've talked about and make a suggestion or two.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Go ahead, Alice.

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: The United States needs a foothold in Antarctica. We've ruled out taking the entire continent and we would like to avoid an outright, full-on war with Sweden. First, the objective is to conduct reconnaissance missions to find Swedish military outposts or black sites in Antarctica that could violate the treaty. If we find any, we could use them as a pretext for whatever this operation will be. The Navy will have a presence in the Southern Ocean, but not past 60 degrees south, unless we can hide it. The Coast Guard will deploy cutters and icebreakers to the Southern Ocean. Now, the question is, where do we put boots on the ground in Antarctica, and how do we get them and the equipment that they need there? Admiral Walker, is the Coast Guard up to do this mission on its own?

MASON WALKER [COAST GUARD]: I'm going to need more details, but it is theoretically possible. The Coast Guard has long-range fix-winged aircraft that could do a mission like this, but it depends at what scale you would want it done. If, for example, you wanted to put Coast Guardsmen, or other personnel, at McMurdo in Antarctica, we could do that if we launched from Australia. In the beginning we would need to drop off supplies and forces who can reopen the airstrip near the station. After that, it's just sending plane after plane.

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: Mister President, would reoccupying McMurdo Station meet you goal of having a foothold in Antarctica?

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Maybe, I'll have to think about it... I want different options of what would be the smallest operation to retake McMurdo and other stations, to large scale options involving taking entire regions of the continent. Can you do that?

ALICE FINK [N.S. ADVISOR]: Yes sir.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Robert, send the USS Jimmy Carter to start sniffing for military activity like Admiral Goodman suggested. He should take lead on where the submarine goes. Also, look into getting other reconnaissance missions down there.

ROBERT M. GATES [DEFENSE]: Absolutely, Mister President.

BENJAMIN SINCLAIR [POTUS]: Take the day to put together some options on this. I would like to meet tomorrow morning again.

HARVEY BAKER [CHIEF OF STAFF]: Thank you, everyone.​