- Jul 2, 2018
- 3,039
Hi yeah I'm back, this is my first suggestion as I only realised it now that I'm Canada and my geography has changed but there's a huge issue with the transit map and the system as a whole I guess.
It doesn't take into account the earth is a spheroid. For example, on that map it would take me a solid few days to sail from Ellesmere Island to Russia, but in reality the distance is not that much as well. Also the projection is a bit screwed and I learn this as I major in Geography and Spatial Sciences, the projection is at least not Mercator but it's not Galls-Peter either it's somewhere in between and the sizes of areas nearer to the poles are still relatively enlarged compared to their realistic size. I suggest we make a transit system based more on realism, where's we calculate distance from point A to B and factor in the speed of the ship/aircraft, because it also diminishes the possibility of an aircraft travelling at Mach 3 (blackbird) to get to a destination a lot quicker than a conventional aircraft (737).
This clip should explain the issues with the map projection a bit more clearly:
It doesn't take into account the earth is a spheroid. For example, on that map it would take me a solid few days to sail from Ellesmere Island to Russia, but in reality the distance is not that much as well. Also the projection is a bit screwed and I learn this as I major in Geography and Spatial Sciences, the projection is at least not Mercator but it's not Galls-Peter either it's somewhere in between and the sizes of areas nearer to the poles are still relatively enlarged compared to their realistic size. I suggest we make a transit system based more on realism, where's we calculate distance from point A to B and factor in the speed of the ship/aircraft, because it also diminishes the possibility of an aircraft travelling at Mach 3 (blackbird) to get to a destination a lot quicker than a conventional aircraft (737).
This clip should explain the issues with the map projection a bit more clearly: